Category Archives: Press Release

Recent press releases featuring Mussio Law Group.

Wes Mussio Interviewed on the Importance of Hiring an Injury Lawyer Who Does Not Also Work for ICBC

Posted on by Goodman Law

As discussed on our website, many personal injury lawyers supplement their practice by acting for ICBC as well. The result is a potential conflict, and clients may be left wondering whether their lawyer avoided a fight out of fear of losing ICBC’s business on other files. Wes Mussio was recently asked to expand on this […]

Court Rejects ICBC’s Application to Assess Our Client By ICBC Doctor

Posted on by Goodman Law

Goodman Law is pleased to announce our recent success in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, in which we defended our client’s interests by preventing a medical assessment (IME) by an orthopedic surgeon chosen by ICBC. IMEs are often obtained by both the claimant and ICBC during the litigation process, the purpose of which is to […]

Injured Client Awarded $683,810 at Trial After Rejecting Final Offer of $280,000

Posted on by Goodman Law

Goodman Law is pleased to announce our success in the British Columbia Supreme Court case of Ackermann v. Pandhar, 2017 BCSC 880. The Court awarded our client $683,810 for injuries sustained in a 2011 motor vehicle accident, which substantially exceeded the insurance company’s final offer of $280,000 before trial. Our client sustained a number of […]

Goodman Law Obtains Over $250,000 For Client At Trial

Posted on by Goodman Law

Goodman Law is pleased to announce our success in the British Columbia Supreme Court decision of Sohal v. Singh, 2017 BCSC 734. Our client was awarded $252,431.79 in damages resulting from a car accident which occurred on November 26, 2011, where she sustained a fractured kneecap resulting in ongoing chronic, knee and leg pain. In […]

Court Questions Credibility and Rejects Opinion of ICBC Doctor Martin Grypma

Posted on by Goodman Law

In claims involving personal injury, it is often necessary for both the claimant and ICBC to retain independent medical experts to assess the claimant’s injuries. The purpose is to have an independent doctor provide the parties – and ultimately the Court – with an impartial expert opinion on the claimant’s injuries. The opinion usually includes a diagnosis of […]